Eblobal · API-side comparison
Prefer API-first B2B outbound data and agents? An alternative to Eblobal
Eblobal is a well-known an outbound workbench + customs-data service for exporters, delivered mainly as a workbench for sales teams. TradeWind takes a different path — a REST API and SDK that exposes company, contact, email, customs and agent capabilities you can drop into your existing CRM, agent or SaaS. TradeWind exposes customs, contact, email and agent capabilities as REST APIs and SDKs — ready to embed in your own system or serve as the data backbone for an agent orchestration.
- API-first — no workbench migration required
- BYOK, with swappable upstream vendors
- Per call or per valid record, no seat fee
- 100+ global sources unified
TradeWind API vs Eblobal: how the two are shaped
| Dimension | TradeWind API | Legacy vendors (Eblobal) |
|---|---|---|
Product form | REST API + SDK | SaaS workbench with seat subscriptions |
Primary audience Eblobal is positioned as an outbound workbench + customs-data service for exporters; TradeWind ships embeddable data and agent APIs. | Developers, agent builders and SaaS teams | Trade sales and ops teams |
Embed into your product / CRM / agent | ||
BYOK — bring your own upstream keys TradeWind supports BYOK for Apollo, Hunter, Snov.io, RocketReach, Reoon and more. | ||
Configurable / replaceable upstream sources | ||
Multi-source waterfall (first-match / aggregate) | ||
Bill-of-lading customs data | ||
AI agent async deep-research API | ||
Billing model | Per call or per valid record — no seat fees | Subscription or seat-based |
Million-row async batches |
Why builders pick TradeWind API
Every capability ships as REST plus SDKs, ready to drop into the CRM, agent or n8n / Coze / Dify workflow your team already runs — no migration required.
Bring your own Apollo, Hunter, Snov.io, RocketReach or Reoon key. The order, toggles and vendor mix inside every waterfall are yours to arrange.
Misses cost nothing, seats are free, and account permissions are decoupled from usage quota — so allocating credits across teams and products stays simple.
Typical use cases
Wire the company, contact and email-verify endpoints into Salesforce, HubSpot, Feishu Base or DingTalk — no need to replace your current system.
Ship plug-and-play outbound data and research tools to LangGraph, Coze, n8n or Dify while keeping agent orchestration entirely in your hands.
TradeWind handles sourcing and verification; you pick the channel — Smartlead, Instantly, Lemlist or your own SMTP. No lock-in on how you send.
White-label TradeWind inside your CRM, outbound, recruiting or research product — your users never see the plumbing.
Pricing & billing
- 1 USD = 40 credits, prepaid
- No seat fees, no minimums, no annual contracts
- Email verify: 0.1 credits per record
- Customs record: 0.14 credits per record
- Agent task: 0.54 credits per valid record
- BYOK cuts orchestration fees in half
FAQ
›Does TradeWind API replace Eblobal?
Not really — the two solve different problems. Eblobal is an outbound workbench + customs-data service for exporters for sales and ops teams; TradeWind API is data and research infrastructure for developers and agents. Many customers run both, or use TradeWind to power systems outside of Eblobal.
›Can I use TradeWind without a developer on the team?
TradeWind API is built for developers and agent workflows. If you don't have engineering resources, use the TradeWind workbench at https://www.trade-wind.co, or call the API from low-code tools like n8n, Coze or Feishu Base.
›Can I reuse my Apollo or Hunter subscription?
Yes. Bind your BYOK key and that source bills at half the platform price. Your vendor quota is consumed as usual — no double billing.
›Is TradeWind's customs and contact data compliant?
Every dataset comes from public commercial sources, deduped and cleaned. TradeWind aligns with GDPR and CCPA and honors data-deletion requests.
›Where does the comparison on this page come from?
This comparison is compiled from the public product docs and websites of both Eblobal and TradeWind. It only describes differences in product form and openness and isn't an assessment of Eblobal's capabilities. Where anything differs from the vendor's latest official information, treat the vendor's information as authoritative.